noShade color=#000000>
Is Hell Exothermic or Endothermic? A True Story...
A thermodynamics professor had written a take-home exam for his graduate students. It had one question: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with a proof." Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we postulate that if souls exist, they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell, and at what rate are souls leaving? I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.
Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions, and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant.
1: So, if hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
2: Of course, if hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.
So which is it? If we accept the postulate given me by Suzie Smith during freshman year, and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then #2 cannot be true, and hell is exothermic.
Rules of the Lab
1. If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
2. When you don't know what you're doing, do it neatly.
3. Experiments must be reproducible, they should fail the same way each time.
4. First draw your curves, then plot your data.
5. Experience is directly proportional to equipment ruined.
6. A record of data is essential, it shows that you've been working.
7. To study a subject best, understand it thoroughly before you start.
8. To do a lab really well, have your report done well in advance.
9. If you can't get the answer in the usual manner, start at the answer and derive the question.
10. If that doesn't work, start at both ends and try to find a common middle.
11. In case of doubt, make it sound convincing.
12. Do not believe in miracles---rely on them.
13. Team work is essential. It allows you to blame someone else.
14. Unmarked beakers contain fast-acting, extremely toxic poisons.
15. No experiment is a complete failure. At least it can serve as a negative example.
16. Any delicate and expensive piece of glassware will break before any use can be made of it. (Law of Spontaneous Fission)
A Brief List of Scientific Literature Definitions
It has been long known = I haven't bothered to check the references
It is known = I believe
It is believed = I think
It is generally believed = My colleagues and I think
There has been some discussion = Nobody agrees with me
It can be shown = Take my word for it
It is proven = It agrees with something mathematical
Of great theoretical importance = I find it interesting
Of great practical importance = This justifies my employment
Of great historical importance = This ought to make me famous
Some samples were chosen for study = The others didn't make sense
Typical results are shown = The best results are shown
Correct within order of magnitude = Wrong
The values were obtained empirically= The values were obtained by accident
The results are inconclusive = The results seem to disprove my hypothesis
Additional work is required = Someone else can work out the details
It might be argued that = I have a good answer to this objection
The investigations proved rewarding = My grant has been renewed
Synthesized according to standard protocols = Purchased
While it has not been possible to provide definite answers to these questions = The experiment didn't work, but I wanted to publish anyway
Extremely high purity = Composition unknown except for the exaggerated claims of the supplier
Three of the samples were chosen for detailed study = The results on the others didn't make sense and were ignored
Handled with extreme care during the experiments = Not dropped on the floor
Typical results are shown = The best results are shown
Satisfactory = Doubtful
It might be argued that = I have such a good answer for this objection that I shall now raise it
It is clear that much additional work will be required for a complete understanding of = I didn't understand it
Thanks to A for assistance with the experiment and to B for valuable discussions = A did the work and B explained what it meant to me
Pretty linear = nonlinear
A Chemist's Last Words...
And now the taste test... And now shake it a bit...What's that smell?In which glass was my mineral water? Why does that stuff burn with a green flame?!? And now the detonating gas problem...This is a completely safe experimental setup. Now you can take the protection window away... Where do all those holes in my kettle come from?
And now a cigarette...
Remember, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.